11-05-2008, 03:22 PM | #11 |
Advanced Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: North west England, UK.
Posts: 3,043
|
Jim, is it just me or is it cropped or clipped on the right hand side?
__________________
Gareth Brandwood The comments posted are made by the fat figners of the individual and do not necessarily represent the views of the brain. |
11-06-2008, 02:21 AM | #12 |
Account Suspended
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: teh Ether
Posts: 559
|
Nope, not you. I relied on an online favicon service when I shoulda just made it myself. This one should be good: favicon.zip
Sorry. |
11-06-2008, 03:32 AM | #13 |
Advanced Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Marin County, CA
Posts: 3,783
|
Hmm, that one's a .gif with a .ico extension, rather than a .ico.
IE doesn't much like that. There's a convoluted history there, according to Wikipedia. Being curious as to what was going on, I converted it to a PNG-based ICO. IE seems to like it better. I haven't tested it as an actual favicon -- too much trouble at this hour. But since I did the conversion, I'll share the result. This should be otherwise equivalent to yours, Jim, including transparency. |
11-07-2008, 05:24 AM | #14 |
Account Suspended
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: teh Ether
Posts: 559
|
Thanks, Bob. I was wondering why I was having trouble with the favicon I made for a website I am working on: http://www.trevathanfloors.com/ The icon shows up fine in Firefox, but not so pretty good in IE.
R'gards, Jim |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|