09-29-2008, 03:07 AM | #1 |
Advanced Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Marin County, CA
Posts: 3,783
|
CA Acadamy of Sciences -- NO GO
Having promised my daughter, I went with my family today.
They were not at all receptive to my entering with my Segway -- though only after I purchased my family membership! They were reasonably polite, but sadly misinformed on a number of fronts. Like several reference to "not ADA approved". Excuse me? Your wheelchairs are not ADA approved either, there's no such thing! "It's a very heavy machine". not nearly so heavy as the powered wheelchairs they allowed in! "We've researched the matter. Even their inventor says they're not a disability aid". "There are a lot of small children around!" Interestingly, when I did give in (after canceling my membership) and use their wheelchair -- I ended up getting a nice tour being pushed by their head of customer services -- we had several wheelchair-pedestrian collisions -- including with said small children. No injuries, but he was MUCH more aggressive about working our way through pedestrians than I would have been! This whole thing ended up separating me from my family for most of our time there. When we finally did locate each other (NO CELL PHONE SERVICE in the aquarium area!), my daughter pushed me around. I managed to keep her from running anyone down -- barely. But then when I took over, I ran into her. That's pretty much my typical experience with wheelchairs in crowds. They don't interact very well at all -- Segways do MUCH better. I've done crowded days at the Exploratorium in both modes, and there's no doubt in my mind -- Segways are safer. And if you get your toe run over, there's no question which one you want. I've got my daughter's ER medical bill to prove that manual wheelchairs are dangerous. When she pulled my Segway over her toe (with me on it with my hands full), she did so in slow motion, and it didn't stop her from doing what she was doing! (Trying to get a book out of my bag). (It did produce some discomfort, but no injury). Their wheelchairs were all very wide. I initially intended to go look for my family under my own power, but I found that configuration had my arms tired out almost immediately. Anyway, I intend to pursue this, and try to get the policy changed. (I especially want to blow up this notion of "not ADA approved!". Even if i lose, they need to not try to justify their policy on a mistaken idea of the ADA). Anyway -- the reasons I'm posting, are first, to alert people as to the situation, and to ask for advice. I'm not looking to screw them over, or get back at them. I can deal with people being wrong -- I hate it when it happens to me! I just want to get the policy changed, preferably through education. I do plan to contact DRAFT, though I'm not sure what help they can give? Hopefully at least good advice. |
09-29-2008, 03:02 PM | #2 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Vancouver, WA
Posts: 235
|
I don't think so...
I've just read their policy on accessibility:
http://www.calacademy.org/visit/plan...A_Overview.pdf Wheelchairs may be obtained, free of charge, with the deposit of a photo I.D. at Coat Check. They are available in limited numbers, on a first-come, first-served basis, Now, in this age of identity theft, how can they possibly think that one would leave a driver's license in a place that you have no idea who has access to it. I would never, ever consider giving a stranger my license for any reason. Nelda |
09-29-2008, 03:15 PM | #3 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: St. Louis, MO, USA.
Posts: 479
|
Unruh
Quote:
That's the best advice we can lend at the moment JK |
|
09-29-2008, 04:26 PM | #4 | |
Advanced Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Marin County, CA
Posts: 3,783
|
Quote:
I'll definitely look at the UNRUH Civil Rights Act; I don't have any knowledge about it. I'm not looking to get rich (even figuratively), but to get the policy changed. I'd prefer to educate and get enthusiastic acceptance than litigate and get grudging acceptance, and I'm not looking to harm an otherwise fine institution. That's not to mean I wouldn't sue to make the point (for all). This is the first time I've been turned away, and even negative reactions are rare (other than security guards consulting their superiors when challenged, and only then giving their blessing -- the latest being the local hospital). Thanks again. |
|
10-06-2008, 12:34 AM | #5 |
New Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 7
|
Cal Academy of Sciences NO-Segway policy!
Bob,
I recently contacted the Cal Academy of Sciences in advance of my visit to be sure they granted permission to use my Segaway (as my mobility aid). Here is my letter to them, and their response: From: GP To: accessibility @ calacademy.org Cc: nlosey @ calacademy.org, mod @ sfgov.org, DRAFT ... Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 4:24 pm Dear Cal Academy Management and ADA Coordinator, I have a medical need for which I use a Segway PT (EPAMD) as my primary and sole mobility aid if and when I require the benefit of such a device. I am visiting the Bay Area and I plan to attend the opening of the Cal Academy of Sciences tomorrow, Saturday, Sept. 26th and will require use of my Segway i167 PT (EPAMD) the entire time. I believe that current Federal ADA Law does not specify or discriminate any specific type of mobility aid for medical mobility needs in the United States. In your ADA Overview brochure, at the top of page 6 it states the following policy: "Only seated assistance vehicles are approved for indoor use in the building" See: ADA_Overview.pdf, top of page 6 for reference to your published document on your website. I believe that this policy is in violation of ADA law and that he city of San Francisco allows the usage of a Segway PT electric personal assistive mobility devices (E.P.A.M.D) anywhere in the city as a legitimate medical mobility aid solutions to those that use them. This accommodation would include any structures built on city owned / leased property and/or parks. It is important to note that I do not own, nor require the use of a "wheel chair" and I believe, that I cannot be compelled to use a wheelchair in place of / nor abandon my present mobility solution to meet facility specific mobility restrictions as long as I display an ADA Placard and agree to obey customary rate of motion trends (pedestrian walking speed). Please have the Cal Academy of Sciences ADA Coordinator / Consultant provide me with published documentation as to the reason(s) why only a "seated" mobility aid is allowed in the facility. Please include any safety data, statistical information, incident analysis, and/or supporting data that makes reference to the usage of "Segway PT" EPAMD devices and their specific exclusionary criteria. Respectfully, GP cc: Susan Mizner, Mayor's Office of ADA concerns, City of San Francisco cc: Nancy Losey, Cal Sciences Academy of Sciences, ADA Coordinator cc: Fred Kaplan, Co-Founder D.R.A.F.T --------------------------------------------------------------------- Here is the response I received: Dear (GP), Thank you for your e-mail; we look forward to your visit. Unfortunately, Segways are not approved ADA mobility devices and are, therefore, not allowed inside our building. We have worked extensively with the City of San Francisco on our ADA policies and procedures β we are a fully ADA accessible building. Unfortunately, due to safety concerns for our patrons, two-wheeled mobility devices are not allowed indoors. Our Guest Services staff will be happy to assist you with other mobility options for your visit. Sincerely, Nancy Losey Director of Operations California Academy of Sciences 415.379.5470 ph. 415.379.5716 fax nlosey @ calacademy.org -------------------------------------------------------------------- It is too bad the City of San Francisco isn't "minding the store" when it comes to approval of ADA policy for what is supposed to be a "state-of-the-art", super green, efficient, futuristic 500 million dollar science center build by a world renown architect! Do you think the architect, Renzo Piano knows that his science center took a 20 year step backward in time when it comes to present day mobility accommodations? I wonder what he would think? My advice it to take this up with the Mayor's office and to take legal action the next time you (or anyone) shows up and are refused access. Just take notes when they are in the process of refusing you your rights. Eventually, the legal bill will get their attention and they will wake up and get with the program. This is real embarrassment for the City of San Francisco and for futurists the world over that this amazing new Segway accessible science center is off limits to the mobility solution both present and future! GP
__________________
--------------------------------------------------- "Life is like a roll of toilet paper, the closer you get to the end... the faster it unravels!" GP To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
10-06-2008, 01:55 AM | #6 | |
Advanced Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Marin County, CA
Posts: 3,783
|
Thank you for sharing your communication.
This is the part that really gets my goat: Quote:
Because there is no such thing. Explicitly. I just found a new DRAFT report today that looks very helpful and well put together. Jerry Kerr has done a wonderful job of putting this together, and I hope to get them to read it. I would hate to waste my time and the financial resources of a fine institution on legal bills. The other approach their response brings to mind is to attach a small third wheel. First choice -- right in the middle, inline between the other two. If that doesn't make them happy, spring-loaded on the front. Add a seat if needed... It's going to be a few more days before I can get my response put together for them. I have Jury Duty tomorrow, and I face the challenge of getting in on my Segway. On the one hand, I don't expect they'll have any outrageous legal theories. On the other hand, due to some historical events, they take security very, very seriously at Marin courts, and it'll be understandable if it takes some figuring out what to do. And it's not just the Segway -- I have a significant amount of metal in my body -- skull and femur. |
|
10-06-2008, 07:04 PM | #7 |
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ashford, Al
Posts: 156
|
Oh Really?
Thank you for your e-mail; we look forward to your visit. Unfortunately, Segways are not approved ADA mobility devices and are, therefore, not allowed inside our building. We have worked extensively with the City of San Francisco on our ADA policies and procedures β we are a fully ADA accessible building. Unfortunately, due to safety concerns for our patrons, two-wheeled mobility devices are not allowed indoors. Our Guest Services staff will be happy to assist you with other mobility options for your visit.
Now if it is true that they "worked extensively with the city of San Francisco," how, praytell, is it that SF allows the use of Segways on their sidewalks and streets while banning their use by the able bodied? Someone has a hold of somebody's leg. Follow this: http://www.draft.org/draft3/Portals/...0Francisco.pdf Frank
__________________
Never give up. |
10-06-2008, 08:32 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Ponte Vedra Beach, FL/ Mantoloking NJ
Posts: 2,081
|
I've heard that song before.......
As we all know there are no ADA approved devices. Chief Justice of the Supreme Court made that clear when implementing ADA:
One of the dangers of definitions that they may be imprecise with ever-growing changes in technology, in 1991 Attorney General Richard Thornburgh in publishing the first regulations in implementing the ADA consistently said that "there would no exhaustive list of devices and services protected under the ADA because any attempt to do so would omit the new devices that would become available with emerging technology". FDA approved yes, ADA approved no. Nowhere in the ADA does it state that a device must be FDA approved. The argument here is fundamentally wrong. In fact in the Assistive Technology Act of 1998 congress defined Assistive Technology as βany device item piece of equipment, or products system, whether acquired commercially, modified, or customized, that is used to increase, maintain, or improve functional capabilities of individual with disabilities.β and the plot thickens........ That "approved device" line is standard BS for what they already know is a violation of many laws. The ADA was just the beginning, not the end. I'm happy to see you have Jerry's "White Paper" on the Segway and People with Difficulty Walking. There is alot of important info on the DRAFT site and it's worth making a visit every now and again. If you are new to using the Segway as a mobility aid this thread gives a quick overview: http://www.draft.cc/draft3/DRAFTCHAT...c/Default.aspx Be Big, Alan PS-Forget the extra wheels, they have been tried by many and failed.
__________________
*************************************** Messages from Alan Maccini and are produced utilizing voice recognition software. We apologize for any errors . To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
10-06-2008, 10:20 PM | #9 | ||
Advanced Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Marin County, CA
Posts: 3,783
|
Quote:
Sort of along the lines "but it HAS three wheels. Can we get serious?" The ADA requirements for exclusion on safety grounds are pretty stringent: Quote:
|
||
10-06-2008, 10:25 PM | #10 | |
Advanced Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Marin County, CA
Posts: 3,783
|
Quote:
And especially, thanks for all you've done pioneering and clearing the road. You have done incalculable good, both for current users, and quite possibly for generations to come. |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|