05-20-2015, 11:38 PM | #1 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: SW Missouri, near Springfield
Posts: 875
|
EPAMD = Segway and ???
does anyone have any definitive information on the legal status of Segway clones (1-2-3 wheeled devices using similar technology) when the issue of what is covered by state EPAMD laws comes up?
I'm preparing to confront Missouri's Department of Conservation again (this time hopefully in person) on their blatantly illegal rules regarding use of segs by the disabled. (They now classify "Hoverrounds and mobility scooters" along with Segways as EPAMDs requiring a permit.) The issue of their compliance with state EPAMD law is also likely to come up and I'd like to give them a heads up on this question...
__________________
Lily Kerns ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Faculty: To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
05-21-2015, 07:28 PM | #2 | |
Glides a lot, talks more...
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Pelham, NH, USA.
Posts: 10,356
|
Quote:
Good luck. Perhaps some more familiar with making entities comply with the federal and other mandates will chime in with more or better data... Keep up the good fight.
__________________
Karl Ian Sagal To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. "Well done is better than well said." (Ben Franklin) Bene factum melior bene dictum Proud past President of SEG America and member of the First Premier Segway Enthusiasts Group and subsequent ones as well. |
|
05-21-2015, 09:32 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: ManchVegas, NH
Posts: 2,148
|
__________________
JohnM Anything worth doing for 2 hours is 10 times more worthwhile if done for 20 hours. RUSA #235 UMCA #3877 To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
05-21-2015, 10:39 PM | #4 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: W Hollywood, CA
Posts: 30
|
EPAMD Rules
While EPAMD and Segway have been used interchangeably by many, most states and the Fed impose the following key restrictions on what constitutes one:
Almost all Segway clones are EPAMD devices and if they don't quite meet the definition a court will likely determin that the other device conforms with the spirit of the definition. |
05-22-2015, 12:26 AM | #5 | |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: SW Missouri, near Springfield
Posts: 875
|
Quote:
But that doesn't make it any easier for the shop owner or dept of Conservation or any one else when someone shows up on a "skateboard" or "unicycle" claiming it is their mobility device and that because it uses Segway technology it should be considered an EPAMD and comes under the ADAs OPDMD classification. There will eventually have to be some clarification I would guess.... Without some safety studies to back it up, I think it would be difficult to justify their claim as a mobility device. Just trying to think ahead for potential problem areas...
__________________
Lily Kerns ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Faculty: To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
05-22-2015, 10:08 AM | #6 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Arizona
Posts: 555
|
|
05-22-2015, 12:54 PM | #7 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Bothell, WA U.S.A.
Posts: 167
|
This & That
EPAMD.
The Missouri Revised Statues Section 307.205.1 (see JohnM link) is very clear on the definition and is the basic definition Segway Inc worked out with most states back in the beginning. Two wheel Segway like machines are EPAMD. Side note: Washington state legislature has a 2015 update to our regulations that will include single wheel self-balancing machines as EPAMD. “self-balancing device with one wheel designed to transport only one person by an electric propulsion system” Possible Data to Aid Your Cause. USDoT 2004 summary 'Characteristics of Emerging Road and Trail Users and Their Safety' covers basic trail design features (width, line-of-sight, crossing, etc) and has this statement on Segway User Characteristics. Based on the performance of the five Segways evaluated in the study, a Segway user would not be the critical user for any of the design criteria evaluated. - Many characteristics of Segway users are comparable to those of other emerging trail users. - Compared to most other users, Segway users had higher eye heights, shorter lengths, shorter braking distances, and faster deceleration rates, and required the least space to make a three-point turn. USDoT 2005 Guidance Statement on 'USE OF “SEGWAYs” ON TRANSPORTATION VEHICLES' provides some common language information on how the ADA rules should be read, for example: Individuals who do not use wheelchairs commonly use the lift together with their non-wheelchair mobility devices, such as canes, crutches or walkers. Under this provision, an individual with a disability who uses a Segway as a mobility device must be permitted to use the lift. There are also several (early Segway days) independent studies that all tend to conclude Segway will stop faster, respond faster, are smaller, and are far less dangerous to pedestrians than bicycles on mixed use paths. Enjoy, Craig approaching 8,300 miles |
05-23-2015, 05:30 PM | #8 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: St. Louis, MO, USA.
Posts: 479
|
Where are you being challenged?
Quote:
|
|
05-23-2015, 07:07 PM | #9 | ||
Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: SW Missouri, near Springfield
Posts: 875
|
Quote:
Quote:
However I just requested the latest rules, etc from the MDC and they have changed nothing (except to add classifying mobility scooters as EPAMDs). My traveling has been a bit limited for the last few months and I have not been anywhere that I have been challenged by the MDC. However, anyone searching for information from their web site would find only a single mention of segways-- a statement that the Springfield Nature Center will allow segs but a permit is required. A request to the keeper of records (if you manage to locate that link) will get the same information I just requested. I've been dealing with them for more than six years now. In the beginning I was told that they had no policy (except no way, Jose!) and was notified 10 months later that they had a policy...absolutely no segs on any MDC property! My protests finally got acknowledgement that I could use their restrooms, roads and parking lots... I notified them as soon as ADA 2010 information was available, giving them a year and 8 months to comply .. And as usual nothing has happened. Besides the illegal items in their permit process, the permit system itself means that the minute a doctor prescribes a seg, the MDC is assuming that person is less intelligent, capable and responsible (and needs to be informed of rules, etc.) than they would be if they went back to their car and swapped their seg for a wheelchair -- in which case no permit could be required. That is not a device safety issue for which they could legally regulate their use. After more than six years, my patience has run out. I intend to request permission to appear at their July meeting. (And if anyone is wanting to do that on a seg based issue , good luck in figuring to how to submit your request! Try contacting their general counsel...!) If I get no satisfaction, I am considering filing a formal complaint and requesting a small compensatory penalty and a punitive penalty in the form of paying the complete cost of providing a half dozen Segways for Segs4Vets.... Comments? Can you tell I am frustrated? When I got into this, I had no intention--or desire--to become a disability advocate....
__________________
Lily Kerns ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Faculty: To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. Last edited by Lily Kerns; 05-23-2015 at 07:12 PM.. |
||
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 3 (0 members and 3 guests) | |
|
|