|
04-01-2019, 08:13 AM | #1 |
New Member
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 10
|
ECORIDER E8-2 Views?
I know this will be controversial but due to such poor servicing and lack of ability or will to utilise my working parts I am thinking of buying Ecorider E8-2s for my tour business.
My reason is I now have a box of very expensive bits that would make at least one good segway if not two. I have spare working CU boards, BSAs and bases but the UK Segway repairers have stated that will not reuse my old parts even for a price to test and fit. I have a segway with a faulty CU board and I asked them if I send the powerbase and spare board could they test and fit/recode for a cost. They said no I have to buy a new CU board so thats a £600 board (and 3 others and 2 £900 BSAs) i have to throw away. For this reason I am looking at moving away from Segway as they are not financially viable for a business tour operator. I am going to demo an Ecorider E8-2 and wondered if anyone had experience of them on here. The Tech sheet looks very impressive especially the waterproof and range parts? Any views would be really helpful Thanks Rams |
04-02-2019, 02:17 PM | #2 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Auckland, New Zealand.
Posts: 81
|
I am finding it difficult to accept the accuracy of the information on the spec sheet for the E8-2 that I found online.
https://www.ecoriderscooter.com/off-...c-scooter.html For example, they claim it can climb a 45 degree slope....how is this possible? IPX6 waterproofing is a difficult spec to achieve. Another thing that stands out is the battery packs are only spec'd to last "1-3 years" which is very short compared with Segway packs. If you were to choose this device for a commercial tour business how can it meet Health & Safety regulations when it lacks full redundant sub-systems? I happened to have the opportunity to ride one of these devices last month, and was not impressed at all. There is a serious lack of overhead in performance under load (i.e. lots of Speed Limiter push-back), and dynamic performance when turning at high speed is very disconcerting and unintuitive (I'm not certain why, but I suspect it does not have Segway's Roll Compensation feature mapped into the steering algorithm).
__________________
Segway New Zealand / Personal Transport Limited • Read the Segway NZ News blog at To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
05-25-2019, 03:06 AM | #3 | |
New Member
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 10
|
Quote:
What are the redundant subsystems you mention when you talk about using these in a tour environment? I know as far as boards are concerned there is only one vs 2 and the separate BSA(gyro) but what difference do these make in a tour environment? I have to say, the torque is better (though much newer gearboxes) the feel is great on the smaller models with lower tyre pressure and steering tuned via the app. I do agree about the E8-2, I found that unrideable! Steering was awful and overall ride I thought to be dangerous. Thanks for your input, really keen to understand these resilient sub systems before jumping in. |
|
05-26-2019, 04:59 AM | #4 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Auckland, New Zealand.
Posts: 81
|
Regarding: "What are the redundant subsystems you mention when you talk about using these in a tour environment? I know as far as boards are concerned there is only one vs 2 and the separate BSA(gyro) but what difference do these make in a tour environment?"
Well, here in New Zealand our Health & Safety laws require a business to take all practicable steps to keep customers safe. I believe the requirements in UK are similar. A Segway PT meets this requirement because it has redundant sub-systems. I suggest other brands cannot. Self-balancing devices are amazing - right up until the moment when they stop self-balancing without any warning. Every component fails, eventually (even with the best maintenance program). So it is only a matter of "when" (not "if") it happens. When a critical component fails the self-balancing device either falls over (both wheels lose power) dumping the rider, or turns on the spot and falls over while throwing the rider off (one wheel loses power, the other keeps going). In a broad sense, the critical comments are the battery packs, the motor controllers, the steering sensors, the "gyros" (balance sensors), and the motors. The Segway PT has two of every critical component (including double-wound motors, so effectively two motors inside one housing). If one half fails, the device is still able to maintain self-balancing using the other half, enabling the rider to maintain full control over steering as the device automatically slows to a stop allowing safe dismounting. Other brands of self-balancing device have only one of some/all critical components, so a failure results in loss of balancing/control....and a fall. You don't want your customers falling off because you've put them on a machine that is definitely going to fail at some unknowable point in time. Two other reasons to use genuine Segway PTs come to mind. First, they are actually really reliable and last for years and years. Second, you can use the Segway brand to attract customers to your business (this is vital, really). In my observation over the years, for whatever the reasons, no business that uses non-Segway brand devices for a tour business lasts more than 1 or maybe 2 seasons. What do others think?
__________________
Segway New Zealand / Personal Transport Limited • Read the Segway NZ News blog at To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
05-26-2019, 07:56 AM | #5 |
New Member
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 10
|
Thanks for that and it makes sense. My problem is due to the poor service and repair practice my tour business is no longer viable.
In the UK it is almost impossible to get a Segway fixed in a reasonable time and at a reasonable price. Also Segway always make you pay for new parts. For example from old machines I have 4 CU boards and and BSA all in good working order. For what ever price of testing and programming (Im willing to pay)these components to work together i.e. I have a machine with a failed CU board so happy to send the power base and my spare CU boards to be tested and installed, Segway wont. Not that they cant they are just greedy and want to sell only new parts all the time. In the case of a BSA unit that pretty much renders a used Segway as not worth repairing. That means I have 4k of spare parts that are good for nothing. Their customer service and spares costs is what will eventually drive them out of business as other manufacturers catch up and over take. (nearly there already). I will review your very valid comments and speak to the Chinese developers who seem very keen to improve their offering. I have a unit with UK trading standards and safety and so far they are happy though still testing. Balance boards are legal to sell in the UK without such resilient subsystems though I appreciate they aren't used for tours etc. There is no doubt Segway is a great product but Im finding their way of working impossible due to inflated prices and extremely poor customer service. I really appreciate your very knowledgeable response though. many thanks Ramsey |
09-12-2019, 11:19 PM | #6 | |
New Member
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Australia
Posts: 2
|
Ecorider E8-2
Quote:
Be great to hear back from you with clarity on these points. cheers Nic |
|
09-19-2019, 07:13 AM | #7 |
New Member
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Australia
Posts: 2
|
Ecorider E8??
Further to my last post, I have spoken to Ecorider about how unstable the E8-2 is and I also asked Ecorider about their other models being more stable.. their reply was
..." But according to customers feedback,most of them prefer to drive 21inch wheel.And this is more competitive to sell. And you know our scooter is not Original Segway,they are different products with different cost. On gyro system we know Segway is better,and they develop double gyro controller system which is not workable in our scooters at present. So may have too much expectation on our design to compare to Original Segway".. So they are effectively saying they don't have other feedback from customers that the E8-2 is so unstable... which really is surprising. I'd been keen Ramsey252 to find out which model you are using that works and how you tune your steering on that model as when I ask them that they just don't respond. Cheers nic. |
09-25-2019, 10:11 AM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Freedonia!
Posts: 1,703
|
Regarding Segway's requirement to use new, or formally remanufactured, parts for repair; this is consistent with every car dealer's repair department, and every independent auto mechanic I have ever dealt with.
There is legal liability with every repair, and the risk goes up significantly by using unknown parts. Imagine a court trial for injury, and the repair company telling a magistrate that they were not sure whether the replacement part was actually good. It's bad enough with new/reman parts. At one point in my career, I performed on-the-road testing of automotive electronic controls and sensors returned from the field as failed. The vast majority had "no trouble found", after hundreds of miles of testing. HOWEVER, the legal department (of the Fortune 50 company that I worked for) told us that if we ever got in an accident while testing this stuff, and someone got hurt and went to court, the company "would pay the plaintiff. $10 million. $20 million. Just to avoid the court judgment". That's a quote that I have never forgotten. In addition, as other posters have mentioned, "real" Segs (Gen1 & Gen2) have redundancy on almost every part. Other companies skip the cost of redundancy, but at the risk (probability) of eventual face plant. Without redundancy, a tourist service had better have very good liability insurance. Last edited by Civicsman; 09-25-2019 at 10:17 AM.. |
Tags |
e8, ecorider |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|