View Single Post
Old 10-07-2012, 10:23 AM   #4
KSagal
Glides a lot, talks more...
KSagal has much to be proud ofKSagal has much to be proud ofKSagal has much to be proud ofKSagal has much to be proud ofKSagal has much to be proud ofKSagal has much to be proud ofKSagal has much to be proud ofKSagal has much to be proud ofKSagal has much to be proud of
 
KSagal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Pelham, NH, USA.
Posts: 10,356
5 yr Member HT/PT Owner SegwayFest Attendee
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob.Kerns View Post
The limitation on that point would be that the current comes from the base, and new batteries wouldn't change that. So if the new algorithms involve a higher peak current, the current bases wouldn't be able to supply that, and you'd not get that portion of the benefit.

I have no idea what impact this might or might not have on current Segway charge times -- not enough data. Other than somewhere from "No change" to "50% reduction in charge time".

The reduced charge time will be important because of the higher energy consumption for the new 'hovering' feature of the I3. Other than that, I agree.

When you compare the charge times it is also a difficult task, because you are comparing a battery that is currently in use, to one that has yet to be introduced. It may be smaller, and therefore use less power and less time to charge, it may be the same size but with enhanced capacities, and many more potential situations, including the potential that a new battery will never come to pass.
__________________
Karl Ian Sagal

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


"Well done is better than well said." (Ben Franklin)
Bene factum melior bene dictum

Proud past President of SEG America and member of the First Premier Segway Enthusiasts Group and subsequent ones as well.
KSagal is offline