PDA

View Full Version : Washington Post Article On Segways




wwhopper
06-19-2005, 10:56 AM
We here at DCSEG have been working very hard with local officials to get acceptance of the Segway. In today's Washington Post (Sunday June 19th 2005) here is an article on the issue

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/06/18/AR2005061800925.html

Gliding Roughshod Over Convention
Policymakers Wonder What to Do About Regulating Travel by Segway
By Petula Dvorak
Washington Post Staff Writer
Sunday, June 19, 2005; Page C01

The high-tech, two-wheeled, electric human transporter known as the Segway can cruise on the waterfront but not on the hilly sidewalks of San Francisco. In Florida, legislators think they're all right, if kids who ride them wear helmets. Nebraskans like them, except on freeways. And in Washington, D.C., they can go just about anywhere, except the Mall.

And maybe not always on Metro, but no one's sure of that yet.
Across the country, officials are scratching their heads, trying to figure out what to make -- legislatively -- of this new technology, a device that glides ahead with a gentle lean forward, to a top speed of 12.5 mph, and stops on a dime with the plant of a heel. Should it be treated like a bicycle? A motorcycle? A pedestrian?
Particular attention is being paid to the way Washington handles this. Not only is the nation's capital seen as the ideal Segway city, because of its open spaces and sidewalks with ample ramps, but it is also host to the national Segway convention this fall.

"Nationally, a lot of people are looking to see what we're going to do," said Metro Transit Police Chief Polly Hanson, who made clear her distaste for Segways at a recent meeting during which she urged that the transit system impose a rush-hour ban on them.
As silent herds of tourists mounted on the machines glide through popular vacation spots and handfuls of commuters float past walkers, city and state lawmakers are stitching together a patchwork of laws and codes without knowing quite what they're dealing with.

"It really is an emerging technology, and there's no federal code or law that talks about Segways," said Alexa Viets, the National Park Service's transportation manager for the Mall, where Segways have been banned pending further review. "A lot of people are trying to figure it out."

Meanwhile, enthusiasts are anxiously tracking the decisions on their Web sites -- plotting state regulations on color-coded maps to highlight Segway-friendly places -- and lobbying in places where lawmakers are flummoxed by or hostile to Segways.

In the District, about 120 Segway owners chat online and get together for group glides. "We're not really a lobbying group. Really, we got together for fun, as an owner-enthusiast group," said one of the group's founders, William W. Hopper, who recently took part in a U.S. Department of Transportation study of the device, navigating an obstacle course for a team of analysts. "But it looks like we may have to start doing some advocacy work now."

The devices, which sell for about $4,500, didn't seem to faze national park officials a couple of years ago, when the occasional machine garnered nearly as much wonderment as the monuments. There were no complaints, no injuries and no reason to do anything about them.

Tim Kanaley was one of those early riders, a consultant who got rid of his car after finding the three-mile commute from his Logan Circle NW home to his Southwest office cheaper and more fun by Segway.

But when a local tour group approached the Park Service about allowing up to 20 Segways on the Mall for twice-daily tours, park officials hesitated, Viets said. The officials barred them from the Mall and memorial grounds. They will reconsider the prohibition as part of wider transportation study this fall.

Until the Park Service decides on a policy, Segway riders are allowed to cross the Mall only along streets owned by the District -- Third, Fourth, Seventh and 14th streets, Viets said.
"The rules they're making are really catch-as-catch-can," Kanaley said.

City Segways Tours has a map for guides showing the circuitous route they're supposed to take, said D.C. tour manager Brian McNeill.
From Paris to New Orleans, the group has stumped some city council each time it has introduced its popular tours. The mishmash of rules reflects the confusion. "It really varies. Right now in D.C., the age limit is 16. But in every other city, it's 12. In San Francisco, we can only go on the waterfront. We had a really hard time in New Orleans," McNeill said.

In New Orleans, tour operators haggled for months with city officials about where the machines could travel, he said.
In many cases, city officials worry that Segways are unsafe. President Bush famously fell off one that he mounted before its balancing mechanism was turned on. But McNeill said the D.C. group has had to call 911 only three times since tours began last year.
"Once, a guy fell and scraped his elbow a little, then passed out when he saw the blood," McNeill said. The other accidents were minor scrapes involving riders who weren't paying attention and bumped into other riders. "The injuries weren't as bad as something you'd get riding a bike," McNeill said.

"It's a whole different world of physics and isn't anything like a bicycle," said Chris Walker, a Utah Segway rider who is one of the founders of SegAmerica, a national group. He has testified before a borough council in New York and advised a rancher in Montana, among other actions, in his quest for Segway-friendly legislation.
Walker compared the situation today to the early 20th century, when some cities banned motorcars, ordered drivers to light flares every mile to warn of their coming or even required that a motor vehicle be hidden if a horse-drawn cart was approaching.

At a meeting Thursday, Metro considered barring Segways from rush-hour trains and buses, but board members were split.
"I ride the system every day, and I haven't seen a problem," said Dan Tangherlini, the District's transportation director, who said that establishing regulations for the Segway is creating a solution for a problem that doesn't exist.

But Richard A. White, Metro's general manager, said a policy should be in place because he believes the system will soon be overrun.
Some thought Segways should be treated like bicycles or strollers or luggage.

Board member T. Dana Kauffman of Fairfax County moved to approve the rules, "before I get my toes crushed by one of these things."
That brought a swift response from Neil Schuldeinfrei, a Department of Energy lawyer who commutes on his Segway every day.

"If it ran over his toe, it would be less painful than if I stepped on his toe," Schuldeinfrei testified. "I hate that people make these assumptions about the Segway without being informed."

After much debate, the Metro board couldn't decide what to do and sent the issue back to the safety committee. "For more research, or something," said board member Jim Graham of the District, joining the state of confusion that the machines have created among policymakers.

Will W Hopper
DCSEG Member
Come out to the Mid-Atlantic Regional SEG America Event - SegwayFest - DC Sept 23-25 in Washington DC - The Most Segway Friendly City in America!




SONORAMA
06-19-2005, 12:30 PM
Hey Will great article, glad you could contribute to it! Having just read the negative New York Times article, I'm so pleased to see that sometimes the media "gets it". Great work.

SegwayUtah
06-19-2005, 12:32 PM
New technology is a wonderful thing.

By the way, the reference to cities requiring drivers to light flares and hide their cars is actually a reference to the Farmers' Anti-Automobile Society of Pennsylvania (FAAS).

quote:"RULES OF THE FARMERS' ANTI-AUTOMOBILE SOCIETY OF PENNSYLVANIA"
http://www.vmcca.org/bh/aaa.html [bottom of page]

During the first part of the century, many groups were opposed to the automobile and the menace they perceived it to be. The following rules were proposed; and on Sundays, the rustic haters of the horseless carriage were urged to "chase" automobiles, shouting and shooting at drivers, and threatening them with arrest.

Automobiles traveling on country roads at night must send up a rocket every mile, then wait ten minutes for the road to clear. The driver may then proceed, with caution, blowing his horn and shooting off Roman candles, as before.

If the driver of an automobile sees a team of horses approaching, he is to stop, pulling over to one side of the road, and cover his machine with a blanket or dust cover which is painted or colored to blend into the scenery, and thus render the machine less noticeable.

In case a horse is unwilling to pass an automobile on the road, the driver of the car must take the machine apart as rapidly as possible and conceal the parts in the bushes.

Chris

KSagal
06-19-2005, 03:22 PM
Chris,

I found the last paragraph particularly interesting, as I regularly take my seg apart and hide the pieces in the bushes every time a skittish horse approaches me. Of course, I live in the metro burbs of Boston, so the opportunity is rare...

Will,

Great article... Where can I get one of those colored maps they referred to?



Karl Ian Sagal

Each road you travel should be just a bit better for having had you pass.

Sal
06-19-2005, 03:46 PM
quote:Originally posted by wwhopper


Board member T. Dana Kauffman of Fairfax County moved to approve the rules, "before I get my toes crushed by one of these things."

Ugh! Prejudice.

-Sal

P.S. At least there's debate.

Think Different
www.apple.com

tpkanaley
06-20-2005, 10:18 AM
quote:Originally posted by KSagal


Will,

Great article... Where can I get one of those colored maps they referred to?

Karl Ian Sagal


http://www.segwaychat.com/forum/legal_states.asp

Dragan
06-20-2005, 10:33 AM
Steve Eldridge of the Washington Examiner wrote the drivel below in response to the Metro Board meeting. I sent him a politely worded message suggesting that perhaps before HE casts uninformed opinion on the issue, he would be well served, as would his "tens" of readers, to actually be in close physical proximity to a Segway, perhaps actually ride one. Once he's done that, his commentary may have a degree of validity.

Have you ever seen a Segway? Do you even know what they are? I think it's fair to say that more people have heard of them than have actually seen one. That's because the folks behind the innovation are clever marketers. Even still, jurisdictions across the country have passed laws permitting Segways to be used on sidewalks and elsewhere.

But first, let me explain what these things are: The Segway is essentially a very sophisticated electric scooter. It uses a series of gyroscopes interconnected with a computer system that allows it to be stable in very unstable environments such as bumpy sidewalks and on grass. It has two large rubber tires on either side of a platform on which riders stand. You start, steer and stop these things by leaning or tilting while standing on the platform.

Segways cost about $3,500, putting them well outside of the affordable range for most Americans. The Segway people have sold these devices as "human transports" so they sound like more than toys, and they've convinced some jurisdictions to use them for postal delivery persons and even police officers on the beat.


The reason for discussing Segways at all at this point is that Metro is being "guilted" into allowing them into its stations and on its trains. But Metro isn't going to give Segways carte blanche and is proposing limits to their use similar to the restrictions imposed on bicycles. At this time, this is the equivalent of allowing special parking for all 1938 Bugattis; there just isn't much demand. The Segway folks aren't happy with this either. At the public comment period at last week's board meeting, one Alexandria-based Segway owner/rider who is a lawyer told/threatened the board that the requirement that would allow the disabled to ride their $3,500 Segways anytime in the system as long as they show a doctor's note proving their disability could lead to "a huge potential liability" in the form of a suit based on the Americans with Disabilities Act.

This whole debate strikes me as silly. These Segways are extremely limited transportation devices and there is little or no need to allow them into already crowded train cars and stations. One underlying issue seems to be a conference planned for September called "Segwayfest," and the last thing Metro wants to do is seem unsympathetic to the literally tens of enthusiasts this event will bring into town.

I must say, I feel for those of you in the U.S. that are dealing with this kind of negativism on a regular basis. I am so thankful that we have gotten such positive response from the public and municipal officials.

Under existing laws in our community, the Segway is technically illegal, as are three wheeled mobility scooters (??!!??) however, I have spoken to the head of By-Law enforcement and have his assurance that they know the Segway is different, and will not be exercising any enforcement action on appropriatly operated Segways. We've even been invited to particiapte in a number of City organized events, with our "illegal"machines!
Wayne


Segway of Alberta - Calgary
www.mysegway.ca

tpkanaley
06-20-2005, 11:07 AM
Interestingly enough, Dragan, Steve (the author above) did a couple stories that were VERY pro-Segway last year for WTOP (A local news radio station). He HAS ridden a Segway and USED to think they were great.

Apparently negative press sells more advertising space in the free RAG he writes for now.