03-08-2013, 06:10 PM | #11 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 327
|
A three wheel version of the Concept Centaur would put the word fun in three wheel fun mobility scooter! Fun, fast, and maneuverable would be attractive to a large market segment needing the stability and a seat.
|
03-09-2013, 12:28 AM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: ManchVegas, NH
Posts: 2,148
|
I'm thinking of some kind of a three wheel version of the "Controllable Launcher".
__________________
JohnM Anything worth doing for 2 hours is 10 times more worthwhile if done for 20 hours. RUSA #235 UMCA #3877 To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
03-09-2013, 11:03 AM | #13 |
Advanced Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Marin County, CA
Posts: 3,783
|
I'll point out that with a suitable suspension, it's possible to make a 3-wheeled device self-balancing as well. I have no idea if this is what Segway is doing. But you don't have to raise and lower the third wheel to get self-balancing. In fact, that would be somewhat tricky because you'd have to also shift the center of gravity to be somewhere to the rear of the front wheels, right as it got to the ground.
__________________
Bob Kerns: To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. , To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. Obviously, we can't have infinite voltage, or the universe would tear itself to shreds, and we wouldn't be discussing Segways. |
03-09-2013, 11:09 AM | #14 | |
Advanced Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Clearwater, FL, USA.
Posts: 2,666
|
Quote:
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Daniel Swanson
__________________
"Never stop looking for what isn't there." --Monty Wildhorn Dan Swanson To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. 727-403-2628 |
|
03-09-2013, 11:13 AM | #15 | |
Advanced Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Marin County, CA
Posts: 3,783
|
Quote:
How much better, I don't know, but I suspect it might be substantial in bad conditions (very rough surface and rapid maneuvering).
__________________
Bob Kerns: To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. , To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. Obviously, we can't have infinite voltage, or the universe would tear itself to shreds, and we wouldn't be discussing Segways. |
|
03-09-2013, 01:04 PM | #16 | |
Advanced Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Clearwater, FL, USA.
Posts: 2,666
|
Quote:
Three points of support for a *static* system is obviously the most stable. But in the case of the *dynamic* system of a three-wheeled transporter, there will be many lateral forces pushing the device over onto only two of the three wheels. If the rear wheel is used for steering, what happens to control when it gets pushed up into the air? Or what happens to steering control if one of the other wheels gets pushed up? No, I'd say Segway wouldn't want to throw out the baby with the bath water and all of a sudden not incorporate its magical dynamic balancing system with at 3-wheeled transporter--in a similar way to the way it was kept with the Centaur. That's why I'm guessing that a third wheel would answer the need for greater stability for when the machine was traveling very slowly or stopped, in which case, it should "caster" and follow along with its two big brothers which have been doing all the Segway-style heavy lifting of propulsion and steering.
__________________
"Never stop looking for what isn't there." --Monty Wildhorn Dan Swanson To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. 727-403-2628 |
|
03-09-2013, 01:31 PM | #17 |
Glides a lot, talks more...
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Pelham, NH, USA.
Posts: 10,356
|
Doesn't the "Q" scooter, and the "Rad-to-Go" have steering casters at the rear of the platform? I believe that the brakes are also on these smaller, rear mounted wheels.
I believe that the stance, maneuverability, and surely stability of those device are all far below the standards set by segway... By stance, I mean the stability of simply being still, with a rider on the platform, on a slope. Surely, braking facing down on a slope is an adventure with this technology. I can see how a caster, similar to those on a PUMA can be incorporated, yet not be part of the propulsion system. There I go... I said I was not going to try and speculate, and now I am. I really do want to try not to...
__________________
Karl Ian Sagal To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. "Well done is better than well said." (Ben Franklin) Bene factum melior bene dictum Proud past President of SEG America and member of the First Premier Segway Enthusiasts Group and subsequent ones as well. |
03-09-2013, 02:16 PM | #18 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 327
|
Bringing an open model P.U.M.A. Concept with mods into production or at least using the PUMA platform is logical speculation. The Mini PUMA. Hopefully, it will be a short speculation period and Segway releases a photo along with specifications soon.
|
03-09-2013, 02:24 PM | #19 | |
Advanced Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Clearwater, FL, USA.
Posts: 2,666
|
Quote:
With reference to a 3-wheel transporter, I'm trying to conceive of how Segway won't make another T3 with its inherent instability from a front-oriented steering wheel. It also "pains" me to see those T3s on "fail" videos tipping over like so many of us did on our own tricycles (and even Big Wheels which succeeded them) we had as kids. The BHP Can-Am is a trike with two up front and a single drive wheel in the rear, which seems to be pretty stable. I test drove one and, though different, doesn't seem unstable at all. But a Segway-esque 3-wheel transporter would have a very narrow stance with a substantial moment of inertia wanting to tip transporter and driver over. The 2-wheel PT we know handles this with dynamic balancing quite nicely. So why throw out that very workable system for the sake of three wheels? I say they'd want to *supplement* it with a third wheel serving a relatively minor role of slow speed/stopped stability, and would therefore want to be not much more than a caster/outrigger. It could also "caster" and not get in the way when the machine was self- balancing going down a steep grade.
__________________
"Never stop looking for what isn't there." --Monty Wildhorn Dan Swanson To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. 727-403-2628 Last edited by SegwayDan; 03-09-2013 at 02:31 PM.. |
|
03-09-2013, 03:58 PM | #20 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: mechanicsville, va
Posts: 166
|
anotherstyle of threewheel transporter
This video appears to be in line with this thread.
be safe enjoy your glide Bob Yarbrough the PONY SEAT guy
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. the PONY SEAT |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|