01-08-2014, 01:05 PM | #11 |
Glides a lot, talks more...
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Pelham, NH, USA.
Posts: 10,356
|
Yes, it is easy to forget, but it is not uncommon at all to fall or have issues with a new segway. (Or any other device or conveyance)
We all have done it a time or two or more, as was my case. Easy to blame the machine, but more appropriately, in the beginning, we have expectations from the machine, and when it does not do what we expect, we call it a machine malfunction... Then, when we know better what to expect from the machine in a given circumstance, we find that we do not have the problems or the falls. Perhaps it might be better to say I did what I thought I should do, and fell off. Later on, I learn that what I thought I should do was not what I actually should do, and then I really did do what I Should do, and I no longer fell off...
__________________
Karl Ian Sagal To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. "Well done is better than well said." (Ben Franklin) Bene factum melior bene dictum Proud past President of SEG America and member of the First Premier Segway Enthusiasts Group and subsequent ones as well. |
01-08-2014, 01:16 PM | #12 | |
Glides a lot, talks more...
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Pelham, NH, USA.
Posts: 10,356
|
Quote:
Most of us have had problems the first few times we tried to glide down a large hill, as Bob mentioned, because the segway balances on a different point, and 'feels' very different than on level ground. I believe I was leaning so far back it felt weird. It was fine, but perceptions were way off the first few times I did it. The solution is to simply glide down the hill slowly, and stand where you should, and lean as you need to. Do not fight the machine, and it will serve you well. I think of it more like a horse than a machine. You kind of need to 'negotiate' a common plan of action. (After a while you realize that the segway is closer to an extension part of your body, than a separate machine. And just like we learn to sit up, then roll over, then crawl, then walk, then run, we also have to learn how to use the segway. The smartest thing I feel the OP said was that he was going to go slower till he felt more comfortable going at speed. That is his exactly right solution.
__________________
Karl Ian Sagal To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. "Well done is better than well said." (Ben Franklin) Bene factum melior bene dictum Proud past President of SEG America and member of the First Premier Segway Enthusiasts Group and subsequent ones as well. |
|
01-08-2014, 04:31 PM | #13 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Lee's Summit, MO, USA
Posts: 1,217
|
Quote:
AFAIK there is no particular indication if the batteries aren't already fully charged. But if your batteries are fully charged, then the Segway will slow down a lot (going downhill). I'm not a student of what "indications" there are, nor of possible differences between models and software versions. Note that we don't know what model the OP has. I agree that the Segway would not "pitch you off" for this reason - but if someone didn't understand what was going on, and tried to "compensate" by leaning forward or back or whatever, the frequently-seen "forward/back oscillation mode" could make it seem like ejection. |
|
01-09-2014, 11:56 AM | #14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Kenmore, WA, USA.
Posts: 2,097
|
It's also worth mentioning that pressure differences between the tires can cause weird things to happen - one of which is the machine leaning forward further than feels comfortable. There's an explanation of this on INC's website. I've only experienced it on level ground, but I can imagine it could be really scary on a downhill.
__________________
35K miles in 15 years! |
01-09-2014, 12:39 PM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Lee's Summit, MO, USA
Posts: 1,217
|
It would be really nice/helpful if eniveld (who posted the question) would provide more details and/or feedback.
|
01-09-2014, 12:46 PM | #16 | |
Advanced Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Marin County, CA
Posts: 3,783
|
Quote:
Any time the controllers need to slow down the wheels, it has to take in energy (basically, make the motors act as generators). When it can, it sticks this energy into the batteries. So in theory, it's charging the batteries any time you slow down.
__________________
Bob Kerns: To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. , To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. Obviously, we can't have infinite voltage, or the universe would tear itself to shreds, and we wouldn't be discussing Segways. |
|
01-09-2014, 08:08 PM | #17 | |
Glides a lot, talks more...
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Pelham, NH, USA.
Posts: 10,356
|
Quote:
I can only imagine that speed limit push back, and speed limited slowdowns consume power. So, while I agree that the motors will act as generators when the machine slows down, or more specifically, will act as generators when the machine is rolling but not requiring energy supplied by the batteries and motors to move forward, (because the energy is supplied by momentum or gravity), I am not sure if they will create more power than they consume any time you slow down, or just many times. I suspect that they act like generators many times, but not at all times you slow down...
__________________
Karl Ian Sagal To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. "Well done is better than well said." (Ben Franklin) Bene factum melior bene dictum Proud past President of SEG America and member of the First Premier Segway Enthusiasts Group and subsequent ones as well. |
|
01-10-2014, 06:47 PM | #18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Lee's Summit, MO, USA
Posts: 1,217
|
I suspect this is absolutely the case.
I'm also sure that there are times when the requirement is "slow down really quickly", so the servo motors are powered "in reverse", using energy rather than recovering and storing it. And I'm sure there are times when the controller can recover a small amount of energy in the simple process of slightly slowing down. It's really difficult for the controller to tell the difference between "slow down a bit" and "don't speed up going down this hill". Of course, none of that relates to the OP's question. The only potential relationship is the additional controller requirement to try to avoid overcharging the batteries, if they are already fully charged. |
01-12-2014, 01:55 AM | #19 | ||
Advanced Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Marin County, CA
Posts: 3,783
|
Quote:
Quote:
From an electrical point of view, there's no magic switch that makes a motor behave differently. If you apply current to create a torque, and it's turning in the direction that's opposing the torque, that motion is going to create a voltage corresponding to that motion. In a motor, current is proportional to torque, voltage is proportional to voltage. You can play games with how you connect the windings, etc. and change the constant of proportionality, but you can't change that fundamental fact. If you're slowing it down, you're taking out energy, and that energy has to go somewhere. If not the battery, then it has to be dissipated as heat, in some resistive load. But the motors, when braking, are always acting as a generator. Here's an example (of many) of using resistive loads to achieve braking: http://www.postglover.com/cranecontrol.html Really, the only alternative besides storing the energy or using a resistor of some type, is to use a friction brake -- the mechanical equivalent of a resistor.
__________________
Bob Kerns: To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. , To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. Obviously, we can't have infinite voltage, or the universe would tear itself to shreds, and we wouldn't be discussing Segways. |
||
01-12-2014, 11:34 AM | #20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Lee's Summit, MO, USA
Posts: 1,217
|
Absolutely correct, Bob. I was apparently suffering from a bad case of recto cranial inversion. I should have stuck with basics.
|
Tags |
accident, level |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|