02-13-2015, 11:08 AM | #1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 38
|
Forbes - Excellent Article
This is an excellent article as it relates to the marketing failures of Segway. Perhaps they would have been better served consulting with DRAFT/Segs4Vets organizers along the way.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/adamhart...-all-failed/2/ |
02-14-2015, 12:04 PM | #2 |
Uber Administrator
Wise Segway Elder Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Greater Boston
Posts: 6,996
|
Sorry, but I don't think the author of that article really studied the history of Segway hard enough by talking to actual folks who worked there (instead of just relying on newspaper articles written about the company).
Had he interviewed actual folks from Segway, he would've discovered, that indeed, half our marketing and sales efforts in those early years was in identifying the niche area the product could fulfill a need. We had a whole team working on the problem. The problem isn't simply one of "identification" -- the need also needs to fit the budget. And frankly, the biggest ding against the product then as it is today is the cost. We found plenty of interested parties who had nothing but good things to say about the product in a number of industrial applications. But when it came time to put in a PO, they couldn't stomach the costs for something that would marginally make their employees more productive. Paramedics and cops loved the thing for patrolling in large crowds, because they could move slow when they needed to, but move fast when a situation arose needing their attention. But there was no budget for it... Segway is not a strict "failure" in the traditional business sense (also making it a bad example for this particular article). It's still a thriving, ongoing concern. It still sells units every single week. It still services existing units. So while, no, Jobs' and Bezos' vision for the success of Segway (interestingly left out of the article) wasn't grounded in reality, it actually pivoted enough to still be in business selling the same product (basically) it launched with. So this article was largely a failure, because the author didn't understand that in the early days of Segway, we were very focused on finding niche markets and serving them. They just never materialized in the numbers we all had hoped. John
__________________
-- An original Segway employee, 2001-2005 |
02-14-2015, 10:21 PM | #3 | |
Advanced Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Clearwater, FL, USA.
Posts: 2,666
|
Quote:
From my own perspective as a Segway PT owner and frequent glider for over a decade, there are a few other less defined and perhaps even less discussed "barriers" to mass market adoption beyond cost: a requirement for a high level of agility, alertness, and a keen awareness of the glider's surroundings—at all times—while gliding; the necessity of a good grasp of the operating characteristics and limitations of the machine; a substantial level of responsibility as a Segway glider for being a "good ambassador" which involves obeying local regulations, showing respect for and courtesy to other pedestrians, demonstrating good relations with business owners and establishments in respecting any and all restrictions and regulations for operating Segways on respective business property. Take your own casual survey of people around you at any time of the day or night. They don't look around. They barely even look up. They look down at the ground immediately in front of them—and not even that if they're glued to their "smart device." So, for such a person to expect consistently safe, incident-free glides, they would have to rise to the occasion fully and realize that they're going to have to be uncommonly observant of their surroundings while gliding. From my own experience of having been a Segway tour guide a good number of times, most average people can get through a Segway tour unscathed. Everyone's gliding slowly and the guides are watching everyone, ready to step in for any needed assistance. But for someone to expect to glide solo "out in the wild" on a daily basis and stay healthy, they really have to step up and out of "zombie mode" as a pedestrian. If someone tends to shrug off "technical" things, they're asking for trouble when operating a Segway. It's not as robust as a bike or other manually operated conveyance. It has its operational characteristics and limitations. Gliding without a good grasp of and respect for those factors is literally asking for trouble. So considering all of the above, it's not surprising how few Segways get bought by individuals. The consumer market for Segway PTs on not only a niche, it's a MICRO-niche.
__________________
"Never stop looking for what isn't there." --Monty Wildhorn Dan Swanson To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. 727-403-2628 Last edited by SegwayDan; 02-14-2015 at 11:20 PM.. |
|
02-15-2015, 12:17 AM | #4 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Freedonia!
Posts: 1,703
|
Quote:
Quote:
There must have been some really interesting investor meetings after the realization that the product was going to top out at numbers that were not going to pay back their investments. |
||
02-15-2015, 10:03 AM | #5 |
Uber Administrator
Wise Segway Elder Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Greater Boston
Posts: 6,996
|
I can show you stacks upon stacks of market analysis done for the Segway before, during and after launch. To claim that no market analysis was done is simply to not know the facts. The analysis showed the niche markets that Segway should pursue, which is exactly what it did (and still does to this day).
More than half of marketing and sales was devoted to commercial uses and applications. A much smaller portion was devoted to consumer sales. The problem, again, was not knowing what markets to pursue, but finding out there was no way to deliver the product to those markets at a price point that made sense. This was not a failure of marketing or sales so much as a failure to understand the product made sense only at certain price points. And we could never reach those price points (especially early on). Think of it this way... what if the original Kindle cost $1000? Would anyone have bought it? Would it be the success it is today? What about the original iPod, what if that had been priced at $1000? (Within 8 months of introducing the original iPod at $399, Apple discovered cheaper is better when it comes to consumer goods and released one for $299.) You cannot divorce pricing from everything else. As for "thriving," given that the company is privately owned, we don't know its financials. But here it is nearly 15 years later and the company is still in business. Which is a lot more than you can say about 90 percent of startups. John
__________________
-- An original Segway employee, 2001-2005 |
02-15-2015, 02:54 PM | #6 | |||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Freedonia!
Posts: 1,703
|
First of all, I did not claim that "no marketing analysis was done". What I wrote was "Either the potential markets were misidentified or misunderstood". Quite clearly, the results of whatever marketing was done (pre-investment) was terribly flawed.
Again, we can argue about what was and was not done in Segway's crack marketing department, but the results are clear. If the pre-investment market analysis was even reasonably accurate, investors would have been told that production would top out at a tiny fraction of the numbers being thrown around by those who were promoting the product, and that investors would therefore likely never see a return on their investment. That would have been the end of it. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
The fact that the company has not failed outright is hardly proof of "thriving". What else you got? |
|||
02-15-2015, 04:36 PM | #7 | |
Glides a lot, talks more...
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Pelham, NH, USA.
Posts: 10,356
|
Quote:
It is easy to claim that the sales were far less than some famous people predicted, but to say that the investors did not know what the the true sales numbers would be is to also say that you know what they knew and when. How do you claim to have this inside knowledge? I suspect you are just concluding what they 'must have known' based on your own opinions of what happened. That is quite a bit different. Also, you claim that the company brought in a financial manager specifically to bring the company to IPO. Again, were you in on the top level meetings, or are you just again employing your observations from the outside as fact? I suspect that an IPO was considered, and perhaps a financial specialist was hired to investigate if it made sense for the company or not. Then they got a better offer, or found a better route, or came up with a better plan. I don't know, but I also do not pretend to know the intentions of those who run the Segway company, as they did not confide in me. (As you would have us believe they confided in you, by the way you write your posts) This much is pretty clear, the Segway company is not being run the way you would run it. But of course, you are not running it, so that point is moot. I suspect it is not being run the way I would run it either. And no one has asked me to run it, or asked me to give them advice on how to run it either. We are all speculating. That is fun. But what may be obvious in one person's opinion my not be so obvious in another's, and also may have little resemblance to what actually happened.
__________________
Karl Ian Sagal To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. "Well done is better than well said." (Ben Franklin) Bene factum melior bene dictum Proud past President of SEG America and member of the First Premier Segway Enthusiasts Group and subsequent ones as well. |
|
02-15-2015, 06:31 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: ManchVegas, NH
Posts: 2,148
|
RE: IPO
Perhaps? In May 2006, AP reported: And Segway Inc. President and Chief Executive James Norrod, hoping to parlay the growth into a payday for the original investors in the scooter, has made grooming the company for an initial public offering in the next few years a top priority. Norrod said he was brought in as CEO last year for just that purpose by Segway's principal investors, Credit Suisse Group and the venture capital firm Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers, best known for its early investment in Google Inc. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...900509_pf.html However, it should be noted that I can find no quotable reference to Norrod using the term "IPO", but always spoke of a "liquidity event". I suppose that the sale of Segway Inc to Jimi Heselden in 2010 constitutes such an event.
__________________
JohnM Anything worth doing for 2 hours is 10 times more worthwhile if done for 20 hours. RUSA #235 UMCA #3877 To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
02-15-2015, 06:35 PM | #9 | |
Glides a lot, talks more...
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Pelham, NH, USA.
Posts: 10,356
|
Quote:
__________________
Karl Ian Sagal To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 5 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. "Well done is better than well said." (Ben Franklin) Bene factum melior bene dictum Proud past President of SEG America and member of the First Premier Segway Enthusiasts Group and subsequent ones as well. |
|
02-15-2015, 11:56 PM | #10 | |||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Freedonia!
Posts: 1,703
|
Quote:
With regards to the Forbes article, I made no claim of inside knowledge. I don't know what the original investors were told. However, I think I stated it succinctly when I wrote, "If the pre-investment market analysis was even reasonably accurate, investors would have been told that production would top out at a tiny fraction of the numbers being thrown around by those who were promoting the product, and that investors would therefore likely never see a return on their investment." One can reasonably conclude that whatever the investors DID hear, it convinced them that they were investing wisely and they would get a reasonable return on investment. The sales did not meet expectations, and the investors lost their collective shirts. A marketing analysis is the tool for projecting sales volume. As to why James Norrod was brought in, I relied on media reports that on multiple media reports from the 2006 timeframe. Such as this quote from another AP story, Quote:
Quote:
Such financial reporting can be dismissed out-of-hand, of course, if one chooses. However, national-level reporting of a potential upcoming IPO would generally be quickly corrected by the company, if it were incorrect. Not to do so would raise questions in the investment community. Whatever actually WAS said to the investors, we can all reasonably conclude that "We'll level out at somewhere around 10K units per year and you'll lose your shirt" was NOT what the original investors were told. Please note that this string is about the Forbes article, which is about why some products are unsuccessful. I have not posted my opinion in this string about current Segway operations. |
|||
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|